The model, which can be considered a summary of the well-known Google Consumer Insights, aims to answer one of the “sacred” questions of marketing: “how do consumers decide to buy what they buy, and from whom do they want to buy it?” Answering this question can allow us to obtain the maximum return on investments in branding policies. It can help us protect the brand from fierce and numerous incumbent competitors, as the behavior of consumers also follows these patterns.
The research project underlying the model lasted two years and involved hundreds of thousands of purchase processes of goods of different natures, hundreds of hours of active observation of purchase processes in real-time, and proposes a model of “Google consumer behavior,” which is an attempt to explain better the digital user journey and its implications for companies and marketers. There are some starting elements that the Mountain View company takes into consideration as fundamental in this analysis:
The Messy Middle is a “space” in which information is abundant, and choice is practically unlimited. The consumer maps this “space” according to a pattern consisting of two continuously alternating states, the state of exploration and that of evaluation. At the user level, during the exploration/evaluation phases, the underlying classical cognitive processes and the related biases are used by our brain to make choice processes faster and more efficient, even more so when abundance and breadth make them long and complex, i.e., in the digital world.
As we all know, the relationship between consumers and brands occurs through many interactions, conveyed by different digital and non-digital tools, living and evolving in an “experiential continuum.” In the digital marketing model proposed by Google, this enlarged interaction space is called exposure.
Exposure, in English, is not a phase, but a continuous universe in which the consumer is immersed, a constantly active universe, in communication on many overlapping channels, some of which escape a complete mapping (events, WoM, etc. …). The observation of hundreds of hours of purchasing processes has brought to light an elementary fact, partially contradicted by some specialist readings on the customer journey: the consumer does not follow a typical purchasing process, not even within the same product category/service, and does not follow a linear purchasing process.
The consumer moves from an initial point, a point which identifies the activation of the process called a trigger, to the final point, where he completes the actual purchase, crossing many different contact points, including:
The consumer, bouncing between these sources, acquires information, makes comparisons, checks, and continues to explore, amplifies, diversifies, and then again reduces the choices, selects … and so on in an iterative path that ends only when he decides to conclude the purchase.
The behavior of the observed consumer essentially consists of two fundamental guidelines, which make up the loop of the Messy Middle, as the figure above indicates:
Consistent with some scientific theories, in particular with the one defined as Information Foraging, it has been observed that the user tends to acquire all the information at the point where he finds it if it is deemed valid. At the same time, he immediately changes the information source if this utility does not exist. This fact may support some observations:
Complexity equals length: where the object of purchase is more complex, the consumer tends to generate a more significant amount of alternatives before deciding, and therefore the journey tends to lengthen. Impulse purchase equals a shortcut: impulse or repetitive purchases shorten the path considerably
To complement what has been highlighted, it should be emphasized that when the consumer completes his purchase, he creates an experience, both in terms of the digital process and in terms of appreciation of the product/service. It is a phase that lies outside the model which, however, is crucial to support the repetition of the purchase, which, as highlighted above, reduces the consumer’s tendency to re-enter the loop of the Messy Middle or, conversely, in which one can risk receiving non-positive judgments, even public ones (if the experience provided is negative).
Also Read: External Drives, Cloud Or NAS: Where To Backup Your Data?